HB 2162 (Dutton) Relating to reading instruction, assessment instruments, and interventions provided to public school students.

  • Dutton – Reading is fundamental; highlights low reading statistics in various house districts
  • Toth and Dutton discuss causes of low reading statistics, correlation between reading and prison
  • Bailes – Campus used as example earlier of poor reading stats was in an exemplary rated ISD
    • Dutton – Not using this as an emblem of the entire district, highlighting importance of 3rd grade reading; Louisiana made not reading an absolute bar to moving to 4th grade
  • Harrison and Dutton discuss poor reading metrics for 3rd and 8th grade
  • FA 1 Dutton – Standards for reading instruments, data not to be used for evaluations, parents can select private tutor from list district provides
    • FA 1 adopted
  • FA 2 Rogers – ISDs can continue to use diagnostic instrument if it is high-quality
    • FA 2 adopted
  • Bailes speaks against the
  • Hinojosa – Concerned about testing little kids when there is far too much testing already
    • Dutton – We don’t do diagnostic testing already, bill doesn’t do exit testing
  • Hinojosa – Teachers are assessing without needing another standardized test
  • Hinojosa and Dutton discuss educational needs
  • Hinojosa – ISDs will be being paying for private tutors for students?
    • Dutton – Yes, one selected by the parent
  • Hinojosa – Putting unfunded mandate on schools
  • Harrison – Is this bill a voucher bill?
    • Dutton – In no way is this a voucher bill
  • Harrison – ISD has two years to make sure kids can read, right?
    • Dutton – Yes
  • Bernal – There is a $1k per student element of the bill?
    • Dutton – No, that is eliminated
  • Bernal – Bill still has a fiscal note?
    • Dutton – For the tutoring, unhitched the $1k
  • Bernal – Tutoring required to be outside the school?
    • Dutton – ISD can hire one of its own teachers
  • Dutton – don’t know why anyone would oppose unless they want status quo to stay the same
  • Fails to pass engrossment (54-87) on 4/28
  • Dutton makes motion to reconsider
  • Thompson makes motion to reconsider

Vote reconsidered on 5/2

  • 2 previously adopted amendments: FA 1, FA 2
  • FA 3 Dutton – Strikes section requiring Commissioner to review & requirement to update diagnostic tool every 4 years
    • FA 3 adopted
  • Passed to engrossment on 5/2